I do not agree with yesterday’s test on dpreview. It too .. not like what I get, taking the camera NX200. So I did my own comparison.
Here’s their test.
I made a two screenshots (clickable):
Of course, I had to try a similar test with my own hands, even with two cameras: NX200 and NX100.
30/2, f5.6, 1/100, 7000K, RAW+jpg (super fine), jpg-Normal
These basic parameters are not changed, I just walked with them on all the ISO. The purpose of the test – do not compare the noise. Only – a comparison of JPEGs in equal conditions.
Pencils are slightly tilted, just keep in mind that the focus is in the middle of the picture – on a tree near the symbolic bear.
(By the way, the color can be compared too. Maybe later I’ll try to investigate and write something about the color.)
Here’s what I got (clickable):
The purpose of this test – do not compare the noise. Just – a comparison of paired JPEGs.
Uncompressed PNG for meticulous readers can be downloaded HERE (15 mb)
Sources NX100 (RAW + JPG) - HERE
Sources NX200 (RAW + JPG) – HERE
Do you agree with the fact that this result is far from that which was proposed dpreview.com? It seems that the error occurred.